The Roar
The Roar

Geoff Lemon

Expert

Joined June 2010

888k

Views

300

Published

5.4k

Comments

Geoff Lemon is a writer, editor and broadcaster. He's the host of cricket podcast The Final Word, and author of the book Steve Smith's Men: Behind Australian Cricket's Fall.

Published

Comments

Thanks for the detailed reply Likkewaan. I’m not talking down de Villiers, just acknowledging that with his attacking approach he can’t deliver that kind of performance every game. Like against Ireland, sometimes he’ll hole out. South Africa’s title chances depend on him performing three games in a row, and the bowling being good enough to support him. I’m enjoying watching SA play, I just think their bowling will be found out in the knockout stage.

Sorry South Africa, there's no way you'll win the World Cup

I’m always looking out for you, Biltong.

Sorry South Africa, there's no way you'll win the World Cup

Come on, SC. Marsh’s five-for was as big a fluke as Finn’s hat-trick.

Slog to deep midwicket, slog to midwicket, top edge to short fine, the best catch of Smith’s career at cover, and an outside edge from the toe of the bat during a pull shot to be caught behind.

I’d take him ahead of Behardien, but he’s nothing more than a holding bowler. Before the England game he’d bowled about 800 balls in international cricket for 8 wickets.

Sorry South Africa, there's no way you'll win the World Cup

Yeah, Malinga is entirely out of sorts. I find it strange that people always rate Sri Lanka an outside chance, when they have such a consistent record of going deep into World Cups (20 and 50 over). Won in ’96, semis in ’03, final in ’07 and ’11. Then in the last five years, two T20 finals and one T20 win. Weak in bowling this time, but if their batting goes well they can take anyone.

Sorry South Africa, there's no way you'll win the World Cup

Marsh only played an uncertain prod with an angled bat. Not a great idea against most bowling, let alone Boult.

Great to watch, but Australia just had a World Cup disaster

Cheers Dougie, good comment, on the mark once again.

Great to watch, but Australia just had a World Cup disaster

No worries Jo. I just meant that I’ve written in support of Clarke plenty of times – I respect his achievements, especially in Tests. And he handled himself bravely during an impossibly difficult start to the summer.

But I think it was a poor move by him to campaign for selection in the World Cup, when Bailey had captained in his place for most of the preceding couple of years, and it was poor from the selectors to bow to Clarke’s wishes. So yes, you’ll read that criticism at the moment because it’s relevant, but that doesn’t mean I’m randomly out to trash the guy.

Great to watch, but Australia just had a World Cup disaster

Because he hasn’t played. If you want to play ODI cricket for Australia, you should play ODI cricket for Australia. Clarke has sat out almost every series in the last two years. Shouldn’t be able to have it both ways.

Great to watch, but Australia just had a World Cup disaster

Hi, oldtimer. To be fair, I said that I had no idea whether Bailey would have saved the day. Nor does anyone. But he couldn’t have done worse than Clarke. And yes, Johnson is often the magic man, but I think it’s about having a feel for the day. That’s what McCullum did when he brought on Vettori, bowled him out, and bowled out Boult as well. Clarke should have followed suit with Starc, not turned to Johnson on a day when he’d been smashed.

Great to watch, but Australia just had a World Cup disaster

I’m glad we’re having some boisterous debate these days, DF. Taking Starc off after two post-dinner overs was an absurd move. So was replacing him with a guy who’d gone for 52 off his first four overs.

Great to watch, but Australia just had a World Cup disaster

Nope. I think he has the best average and second-best strike rate in ODI cricket? Or the other way around.

Great to watch, but Australia just had a World Cup disaster

Thanks SB.

Great to watch, but Australia just had a World Cup disaster

Good detail, DB, couldn’t agree more. I rate Watto more than most but he’s in dismal ODI form. Just about picking the best XI now, and that’s as you suggested. Though I wouldn’t promote Faulkner until the last seven or eight overs, keep him lurking.

Great to watch, but Australia just had a World Cup disaster

The Kiwis just played shocking shots trying to get the total quickly. Even the last two wickets, clean bowled by Starc, saw Southee and Milne trying to smack swinging yorkers away for runs. Play like Boult, straight bat in defence, and they would have coasted in.

Great to watch, but Australia just had a World Cup disaster

Correct, sorry, I meant lowest score batting first.

Great to watch, but Australia just had a World Cup disaster

Except he made about a fifth of the team’s runs.

Ok, maybe a sixth.

Great to watch, but Australia just had a World Cup disaster

Maybe you should read a bit more widely, then, before laying down your thoughts.

Great to watch, but Australia just had a World Cup disaster

What’s wrong with it is he doesn’t deserve a place in the side, having barely played in the last two years. Picking him was a clear failing of nerve from the selectors – a political decision rather than a sporting one.

Great to watch, but Australia just had a World Cup disaster

Faulkner is averaging 109.5 in chases, mostly batting at No. 8. I think he’s doing alright.

He also has more death-overs wickets in the last year or so than the next three or four bowlers combined.

Great to watch, but Australia just had a World Cup disaster

He hasn’t had time. He’s a new player. Expecting too much from him is just silly. Even if he is from WA.

World Cup wash-out could cost Australia against New Zealand

Replying to a comment citing averages and strike rates, it’s entirely relevant to talk about wicket-taking.

World Cup wash-out could cost Australia against New Zealand

Them’s fighting words, Tom. He’s a promising new player but he’s getting a lot of backing for someone who’s yet to prove himself.

World Cup wash-out could cost Australia against New Zealand

Unfounded? Yet to bowl the house down?

Before that England game he’d bowled in 22 innings across all three international forms and taken 8 wickets.

First-class and List A figures don’t necessarily prove much, but even taking them into account, a good chunk of his record comes from before his back stress fractures forced a remodelled action. The new Mitch Marsh is a good bit slower and a whole lot less threatening. He could improve, but has shown very little with the ball to date. Nothing controversial about that statement.

And yes, Watson is unquestionably a far better bowler. Poor batting returns this summer though.

World Cup wash-out could cost Australia against New Zealand

Bang on with all of the above.

Australia smash England in Cup opener, but there's one sour note

On your reasoning, Don: Bailey needs “more than one good innings” and is behind others. Like Clarke, deserves his spot because he made 60 in a practice game against the UAE.

Australia smash England in Cup opener, but there's one sour note

close