Where to now for the Western Bulldogs?
By Ben Somerford, 22 Sep 2009 Ben Somerford is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- AFL, AFL grand final, Barry Hall, Rodney Eade, Western Bulldogs
Related coverage
- Western Bulldogs news
- AFL Grand Final news
- AFL news
- Toyota Premiership news
- Western Bulldogs news
- AFL Grand Final 2011 news

Western Bulldogs players leave the MCG after losing the AFL 2nd Qualifying Final to the Geelong Cats
There’s no doubt the Western Bulldogs made significant improvements as a team in 2009. Yet once again they fell short of a Grand Final berth. It begs the question, where to now for the Dogs?
After a second consecutive Preliminary Final defeat, Bulldogs coach Rodney Eade was asked about his club’s future premiership hopes, and ‘Rocket’ was fairly positive about that prospect.
Eade said, “We’ve matured from last year and I’ve no doubt we’ll get better again. I’ve no doubt this group will sting from last night like they stung from last year and there’s alot of improvement left in most of the players.”
The Dogs’ coach is right to be optimistic, as with a bit of luck on Friday evening they might still be alive in the 2009 finals right now.
And despite the immediate pain of losing another Preliminary Final, Dogs’ fans would have been enthused and encouraged by their side’s fight in 2009, especially late in the season.
Defeating Collingwood and Geelong late in the regular season before pushing the Cats and the Saints in the finals, suggests the Dogs can mix it with the best.
And over the course of the season, Eade proved himself one of the best game-day coaches in the AFL, while players like Matthew Boyd and Shaun Higgins took their own games up a few notches each. Indeed, there’s reason for optimism.
But what the club’s 2009 finals failure also highlights is that despite playing well and dominating matches, the Bulldogs lack an efficient forward structure which will kick them the goals to win the big games.
It brings back that argument that the Doggies need a power forward, otherwise they’ll continue to be the bridesmaids.
Indeed, whilst having the Saints on the ropes for long periods on Friday, the Dogs only mustered 7 goals, while down the other end St Kilda’s gun forward Nick Riewoldt won his side the game by booting 4 crucial majors.
The Dogs had the lion share of possession on Friday yet they couldn’t find a reliable avenue to goal. The Saints on the other hand, had Riewoldt and from fewer opportunities he won his side the match. Basically, St Kilda was more efficient.
Eade claimed inaccuracy in front of goal was a major reason for his side’s loss on Friday and it also was a problem in the Dogs’ first final against Geelong. Perhaps his players felt the pressure?
But goalscoring inaccuracy is something which inevitably can go wrong, along with umpiring decisions or injuries or any other little bits of luck which alter a game.
The point though is relying on these things to go your way is an easy excuse.
Eade said after the game, “It wasn’t a lack of a tall forward; it was a lack of ability to kick straight.”
Sure, the Dogs missed a few shots which may have changed the result, but with a better, more efficient forward structure perhaps the result wouldn’t have been open to such chance.
To Eade’s defence, there wasn’t a lot he could do about that last Friday, as the Dogs don’t have a big forward on their list to call upon, but with another draft and trade period beginning soon, the Bullies will have their chance to address that problem.
Barry Hall is a name being thrown about, but the 32-year-old ex-Swan hasn’t been at his best for a long time and struggled since the rule changes involving hands in the back. But the Dogs may believe he’s worth a gamble, especially with their premiership window still open
Another nomadic forward, Scott Welsh, is likely to depart the Dogs, while veterans such as Brad Johnson and Jason Akermanis seem keen to play on and Nathan Eagleton’s finals campaign suggests he should too.
Indeed, the Dogs have plenty going for them and plenty to build on. There’s room for improvement and 23-year-old midfielder Ryan Griffen is a prime example of a player who could increase his game to the benefit of the Bulldogs in 2010.
Whether or not an even-more improved Dogs line-up in 2010 will be good enough to win the premiership without that power forward remains to be seen. Indeed the question is, can the Dogs win a premiership playing the footy they play?
And does Eade, who coached Sydney to a Grand Final loss in 1996, believe it can work, or will he take heed of popular opinion and get himself a power forward?
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
AFL articles
- More rugby league players to defect to the AFL? (160)
- Mobile madness: Optus decision bad news for codes (153)
- AFL divisions are the way of the future (106)
- Foxtel’s AFL coverage is nirvana for footy fans (89)
- AFL’s most hated club turns 120 years old (78)
- Israel Folau now ready for AFL (76)
- Optus ruling actually a good thing for AFL fans (52)
- Andrew Krakouer given four weeks leave from Collingwood
- Giants inspired to prove doubters wrong (32)
- Malthouse not fazed by assistant issue
- Richo says look out for the Tigers in AFL
- AFL clubs’ leadership groups getting out of hand (15)
- Who’s to blame for the Majak Daw beat-up? (32)
- AFL Tigers need to step up, says Cotchin
- AFL clubs’ leadership groups getting out of hand (15)
- AFL divisions are the way of the future (106)
- Crows changing, but will this AFL preview change your life? (2)
- Is Heath Shaw the right leader for Collingwood? (11)
- Could a female coach succeed in the AFL? (36)
- Demons’ two captain Jacks the right leadership choice (5)
- Mobile madness: Optus decision bad news for codes (153)
- Explore:
- AFL, AFL grand final, Barry Hall, Rodney Eade, Western Bulldogs

Brett McKay said | September 22nd 2009 @ 8:49am | Report comment
Ben, I’d imagine the Doggies have already started planning for their assault on next year’s Prelim…
Tom said | September 22nd 2009 @ 10:00am | Report comment
Offering Hall a one year deal has a far greater upside than downside, I reckon.
Warren Vargas said | September 22nd 2009 @ 10:59am | Report comment
Yeah we know what a team player his is and he’ll have his 2006 Grand Final performance hanging over his head till the day he dies. Hall is not the answer. There is enough talent within. They can say poor kicking cost them the game, but time after time in both games against Geelong and St.Kilda would bomb the ball in the forward line with Johnson having to take a big grab, yet down the other end it was a big forward who took the mark and kicked the goal. I am yet to see a Grand Final team without a big forward. I say play Lake down forward, he’s at his peak and Williams can take the Full Back position. They have one more chance in 2010 after that they’ll be going backwards.
sheek said | September 22nd 2009 @ 12:25pm | Report comment
What determines success & failure?
We never hear about Olympians who fail to win medals, but they’re champions in every sense of the word, achieving a gaol most of society won’t ever emulate.
Similarly, teams who bow out in the preliminary finals (Footscray & Collingwood) are still champions even if they failed to achieve the ultimate goal – a premiership win.
I think it’s time teams were acknowledged for finishing losers in the preliminary final, by receiving bronze medals (equal third). This way, the teams, their players & coaches are rewarded with something tangible other than merely a record in the history books.
Grand final runners-up should receive a silver medal because they are champions as well. The winners can get a gold medal, a ring , the flag & everything else that goes with being ultimate champions.
But the point is, Footscray & Collingwood are every bit as champions as are Geelong & St.Kilda.
WA said | September 22nd 2009 @ 2:41pm | Report comment
Hilarious idea. Why not expand the finals series to 10 teams and give everyone a participation medal? There’s 1 premiership team every year, the way it should be. Preliminary finalists are forgotten as they fall well short of being the premier.
Luke D'Anello said | September 22nd 2009 @ 12:52pm | Report comment
Disagree Sheek. Not many people would regard a preliminary final team as a “champion team”. No one talks about them, that’s why. Simply, I think the Dogs get the ball inside 50m enough, but, as you said Ben, the lack of a tall target does show up against the good sides.
They won the inside 50 count 57-40, yet lost the game. They’ll make a big pitch for Hall I would say.
gazz said | September 22nd 2009 @ 1:06pm | Report comment
On the Fox program ‘On The Couch’ they raised Matty Lloyd’s name. What do ya reckon? Would he be any good for the Dogs, and would he want to become a 2-club player?
Also couple others worth mentioning, maybe West Coast’s out of favour Victorian pair Ash Hansen or Brent Staker. Maybe Adelaide’s broken Hill-product Taylor Walker too.
Thing is their window isnt open for much longer, so they cant really draft a fwd and expect to fastrack him. doesnt work. but maybe get someone mature out of the SANFL or WAFL. worth a try?
Pippinu said | September 22nd 2009 @ 3:02pm | Report comment
Gazz
you’re right about the window.
They had it in consecutive prelim final losses in 97 and 98, and it was open for one more year in 99 (but went out in straight sets for yet another disappointing finals series).
So 2010 is probably close to a final shot at it.
Trouble is – at least ten other teams will be thinking the same thing.
Sheek
As a lifelong Footscray supporter – I can honestly say that losing our 6th prelim in 24 seasons just doesn’t quite do it for me – I can’t imagine anyone putting up their hand for a bronze medal.
People might recall that in 1981 (I think it was) Peter Moore threw his runners up medal into the crowd (his 3rd in succession).
Some things are just not worth winning.
The facts said | September 22nd 2009 @ 5:16pm | Report comment
Bulldogs – 6 Preliminary Final defeats in a row.
AFL Record.
I don’t think any other team has lost more than 3 Preliminary Finals in a row. Feel a little bit for Doggies fans, but as a Sainter – can’t say I would have changed Friday’s results. We’ve been around the top level longer than they have – and don’t have any more to show for it. So i’ll take it.
I know they won’t, but if they drafted Barry Hall and kept Scott Welsh – Doggies would have the oldest forward line in AFL history.
Brad Johnson
Barry Hall
Scott Welsh
Jason Akermanis
Nathan Eagleton
Ben Hudson (resting forward)
With the ‘youngsters’
Mitch Hahn
Robert Murphy
to help out.
Nary a fella under 28 there.
Pippinu said | September 22nd 2009 @ 5:22pm | Report comment
All true.
onside said | September 22nd 2009 @ 7:29pm | Report comment
There will be many more ‘where to know’ stories in the future for lots of teams .
The planned eighteen sides means some supporters will never see their team
win a premiership in their lifetime. It must really irk some clubs to see the AFL
give the Gold Coast such a leg up with draft picks and financial incentives all
but guaranteeing them a crack at the big one in the first few years.
I think Sheek has a point about creating greater recognition for those players in
the sides that come second or third.Sure the medal may not resonate too much
immediately after the game,but as the years passed ,I think players would enjoy
having a hard earned momento on display at home.On the same point I have long
held the view that the minor premiers do not receive nearly enough recognition.
How to get this message acrioss I dont know,but its a mighty effort to finish on top.
But all the above is off topic.The bulldogs must heavily cull their list and start again.
I recall Tom Hafey , the then champion coach of Richmond in the VFL in the sixties
saying something like,’if the team has done its best ,and can finish no higher than
third or fourth, then its best to start again with some new players, and be prepared
to finish sixth or seventh for a couple of years.It is impossible to expect current
players to be able to improve to the extent they can win the flag.Their best is not
good enough.Delaying this decision can set a club back ten years”
Pippinu said | September 22nd 2009 @ 7:36pm | Report comment
It’s always a difficult decision as to whether to start from scratch or have just one more crack with what you have.
Anyway, things have changed considerably since Hafey with the draft, etc.
Whether you start rebuilding immediately, or delay by one year, doesn’t make a hell of a lot of difference.
With one proviso – the expansion of teams in 2011 and then 2012 is going to create a set of unique circumstances.
Any club caught with its pants down now, or with too old a list – will truly regret it in a couple of years time.
As for the finishing 3rd or 4th business – even if we think the players deserve something – the truth is that no one sees it as being meritorious in any way – that’s just the reality.
When Bob Skilton played his one and only final in a losing semi in 1970, I’m sure that meant the absolute world to him – but in times of quiet reflection, he’d be acutely aware that he didn’t achieve what he set out to achieve as player starting your career – and that’s to win a premiership – not even three brownlows make up for it.