By AddyP - Roar Rookie[?]
November 3rd 2009 @ 1:47am
Get a Roar profile

6
Like it? Cheer it. More cheers, higher up on page.
Loading ... Loading ...

ADVERTISEMENT
View The Roar's top writers by sport.

Related coverage

Finally international horses aren’t Cup faves

Horse Efficient and jockey Michael Rodd win the 2007 Melbourne Cup- AAP Image/Julian Smith

Horse Efficient and jockey Michael Rodd win the 2007 Melbourne Cup- AAP Image/Julian Smith

Every year the talk surrounding the Melbourne Cup field seems to centre around the overseas horses that travel to Australia in a bid to steal our Cup. And every year, these same horses disappoint.

Remember the hype surrounding the Irish horses Mad Rush, Septimus, and Profound Beauty last year? Purple Moon and Mahler in 2007? Yeats in 2006? Mamool in 2003? Vinnie Roe in 2002?

The list goes on.

With the exception of the Japanese horse, Delta Blues, and the Irish horse, Media Puzzle, winning the Cup in 2006 and 2002 respectively, these high-profile overseas horses fail to match it with the “big guns” of Australian racing.

So it’s a relief to see that this year not a single international horse in the Cup is rated under a twenty-to-one chance. Are we finally starting to realise that these horses keep letting us down, year-in and year-out?

History has proven that anything can happen in the race that stops the nation, so perhaps the lack of favouritism will work to the advantage of these overseas horses. They may excel now that the pressure has been taken away from them and the focus of the media is on the local horses such as Viewed, Shocking and Alcopop.

Or maybe the international trainers have learnt that greater success has come to those who have had a lead-up run in Australia prior to the Cup. Delta Blues ran in the Caulfield Cup then went on to win the Melbourne Cup, while Media Puzzle raced in the Geelong Cup before taking out the big one at Flemington.

This year, Crime Scene and Basaltico both raced in the Geelong Cup, but Changingoftheguard, Mourilyan, Munsef, and Warringah are all yet to race in Australia.

Regardless of the placings in this year’s Cup, it’s a welcome change to see all the pre-race attention on the horses that we’ve had the privilege of watching each week in our own races from Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Adelaide, not international broadcasts from the UK, Asia, and Dubai.

Like this content? Buzz it up!

Free Email updates:

Our daily emails are only sent if there is content for the sport or that author. You can subscribe to multiple daily emails; or get the daily Roar email with all our content in it. We value privacy. More...

 

Crowd Says (3)

  •   Boo Cheers

    Julian Kay said  | November 3rd 2009 @ 7:14am | Report comment

    I always like to oppose the overseas runners, but as you say, with none of them this year being in the market, could it be their year? Don’t foget Bauer ran a very close second last year to Viewed after winning the Geelong Cup.

  •   Boo Cheers

    denis said  | November 3rd 2009 @ 11:08am | Report comment

    i agree and the overseas jockeys are in the same boat

    Regards Denis

  •   Boo Cheers
    View MyGeneration's Roar profile

    MyGeneration said  | November 3rd 2009 @ 5:57pm | Report comment

    Well, the OS brigade has performed creditably this year with 2nd and 3rd, the one at its second start here and the other at its first, so there is still a slight statistical leaning to having a lead-up run here being the better strategy. Of course, we forget horses like the 94 winner Jeune, which was sent out here from Europe and raced as an “Aussie”, but still won the cup on its first preparation in Australia.

Have your Say

If you like this article, Subscribe! Subscribe to our daily email

Please be sure to enter your name and email before submitting this comment. Please also refer to our comments policy

 

Hot debate

What you're Roaring!

By signing up to the daily The Roar email you'll receive all the new articles and sports opinion that we put up on the website each day - delivered direct into your inbox. For free. We think it's the best way to receive our content.

Our emails contain the article along with the images - just like on the website.