Armstrong facing new doping allegations
Related coverage
Seven-time Tour de France champion Lance Armstrong confirmed on Wednesday he is facing new doping allegations brought by the US Anti-Doping Agency that could result in the stripping of his titles.
Armstrong – who has vehemently denied using performance-enhancing drugs during his career – angrily said the new “baseless” charges stem from “discredited” allegations from the past.
“I have been notified that USADA … intends to again dredge up discredited allegations dating back more than 16 years to prevent me from competing as a triathlete and try and strip me of the seven Tour de France victories I earned,” Armstrong said in a statement.
He slammed the agency as “an organisation largely funded by taxpayer dollars but governed only by self-written rules.”
The Washington Post was among the media outlets reporting on Wednesday that USADA had written to Armstrong saying blood samples taken from him in 2009 and 2010 — when he came out of retirement — were “fully consistent with blood manipulation including EPO use and/or blood transfusions.”
Armstrong finished third in the Tour de France in June of 2009 and 23rd in the event in 2010.
Since retiring again from cycling last year, Armstrong has taken up triathlon competition, but USADA’s action immediately bans him from competing.
USADA chief executive Travis Tygart issued a statement confirming “that written notice of allegations of anti-doping rule violations was sent yesterday to him (Armstrong) and to five additional individuals all formerly associated with the United States Postal Service professional cycling team.
“These individuals include three team doctors and two team officials.
“This formal notice letter is the first step in the multi-step legal process for alleged sport anti-doping rule violations,” Tygart said.
The next step is for Armstrong to answer the charges, in writing, by June 22.
According to the Post, which obtained a copy of the letter to Armstrong, USADA claims it has witnesses to the fact that Armstrong and five former cycling team associates — including Italian doctor Michele Ferrari and cycling team manager Johan Bruyneel — engaged in a doping conspiracy from 1998-2011.
Armstrong, however, said the witnesses cited by USADA were the same ones who spoke to federal investigators during a two-year probe that ended in February without any criminal charges being brought.
He called the charges “baseless” and “motivated by spite,” adding that the fact that other cyclists weren’t charged demonstrates USADA’s “vendetta” against him.
Tygart said USADA’s case was supported by evidence, but that until the process was complete, those involved were presumed innocent.
“We do not choose whether or not we do our job based on outside pressures, intimidation or for any reason other than the evidence,” Tygart said.
“Our duty on behalf of clean athletes and those that value the integrity of sport is to fairly and thoroughly evaluate all the evidence available and when there is credible evidence of doping, take action under the established rules.
“As in every USADA case, all named individuals are presumed innocent of the allegations unless and until proven otherwise through the established legal process.”
Tygart said that if the case continues, it will not, in fact, be USADA that determines whether Armstrong is guilty of doping.
“If a hearing is ultimately held then it is an independent panel of arbitrators, not USADA that determines whether or not these individuals have committed anti-doping rule violations as alleged,” Tygart said, adding that USADA would not comment further on the evidence or the issue “unless or until it is appropriate”.
Armstrong, who won the Tour de France from 1999-2005 and used his fame to fuel his charitable work for cancer awareness, has never tested positive.
But he has been publicly accused by former teammates Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton – both admitted drugs cheats – of doping.
© AFP 2013The Crowd Says (3) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- Cycling, cycling Lance Armstrong, Lance Armstrong

June 15th 2012 @ 7:02pm
sittingbison said | June 15th 2012 @ 7:02pm | Report comment
I will say this every time an article repeats the mantra “Lance never tested positive” – he tested positive in 1999 for corticosteroids, he then claimed it was from creme used to treat a saddle sore and got a retrospective doctors certificate. This is ludicrous, he was not a rank amateur, he had been competing since childhood, and there was not the slightest chance he would use creme containing steroids. This was during his initial win after cancer, the world (and Frogs) were still enamored by his cancer recovery story and his less charming personality traits and drug allegations had not yet made themselves public. If this positive had of occurred in say 2002 there is not the slightest chance they would have let him off the hook.
June 15th 2012 @ 7:45pm
Maria Szczerba said | June 15th 2012 @ 7:45pm | Report comment
Well! Here we go again with everyone bringing up the saga for Lance Armstrong and his family! Why cant everyone out there just leave him, me and others alone and those that have been successful and are still being successful, there is a lot of jealousy out there and you can all stop being jealous of those in sport!
I think it is ludicrous and a big kick in the guts to me and others in sport who just are living and enjoying their passion!
No-one hurt any of you so why do people pick on good and great people, you even picked on Phil Anderson and Others in cycling!
The world has become cruel and its about time the world was kinder to the likes of us people and praised all of us for the great work we were doing for the sport and in our lives and what we continue and all the other friends we all have as well as family!!!!
You have my support and so do you Phil and Sick of the badgering!
Enough is enough! Let others get on with their lives and the sport and look at the positives in people!
June 16th 2012 @ 9:11am
sittingbison said | June 16th 2012 @ 9:11am | Report comment
Good to see Lances PR machine even extends to this forum with its mindless twaddle. Yawn.